7 days. Your own key. Real records.
Pull a few hundred real rows through the same API we license and judge the schema and the match quality yourself. Before you start, read what we can and cannot claim on the funds page: no grant-award dimension is audited yet, and we have not measured our lag against other data providers.
Work email required. Last 90 days, 1,000 calls/day, 500 rows in total. No card. See the full delivery story or browse coverage first.
What the trial proves
The job of a trial is to answer one question: is the data real, fresh, and structured the way you need it? The trial is generous on those three. The historical archive (TED 2007–present) is the paid product.
Sources are ingested on a daily schedule. How soon a record reaches us after a funder or portal publishes it varies by source and we have not measured it, so judge freshness from award_date and first_seen_at on the rows you pull.
Contract awards, award winners, grant calls and, where the source publishes them, bidder lists, for the last 90 days. Quality differs by country and by data type; the coverage page shows which countries are audited and which are not.
Winners carry a registry or VAT ID where the source publishes one, plus awarded amount, award date and, for contracts, CPV. Missing fields are null, never guessed, so you can JOIN against your own datasets and see the gaps.
Quick start
Confirm your email, copy your key from the dashboard, and the API is one curl away.
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer sk_eufp_..." \ https://www.eufundportal.com/api/grants?country=PL&pageSize=10
Full schema in the OpenAPI spec. Coverage by country at /coverage.